Autonomous police car patent: Level 5 meets Motorola’s vision for the future of law enforcement officials

Even Paul Verhoeven's 1986 classic "Robocop," prescient since it was, could hardly envision autonomous police cars that may process suspects, extract payments, have a hearing before a judge via videophone, or drive suspects to jail. Indeed, combining two of America's favorite pastimes — cars and litigation — is not imagined around the silver screen in the manner so complete before.

Motorola's patent for any autonomous police car packs a good number of functions in the criminal justice system right into a car, enough not just for Uber drivers but also for police officers to think about job security while in the chronilogical age of autonomy. And it also appears it's not many years from the reality, as the majority of the tech presented in the patent looks Eighty percent ready with current technology.

First, Motorola's "mobile law enforcement officials communication system" can be a Level 5 autonomous vehicle, meaning no driver is needed. Even so the autonomous car is not most important thing here, it happens, and Level 5 autonomy is less than far sometime soon if autonomous car developers can be believed. Second, your car features facial recognition software — already utilized — and fingerprint scanners, allowing your car to identify suspects and bring up their records. There's also a built-in breathalyzer.

Then it gets weird, at least from your due process standpoint. Your vehicle can read you your rights (sometimes in ED-209's voice), and allows you to reach your lawyer including a judge via videophone. After a bail amount is about, you are able to swipe your credit-based card directly inside the car.

"With regards to the infraction, the transaction on the processing may perhaps be varied," the patent application says. "For instance, the testing for drugs and/or alcohol may very well be part of a primary detention, accompanied by an arrest as a consequence of affirmative test results. Prior to some embodiments, the arrest of any individual and site throughout the vehicle is as well as communication system providing the detainee which has a reading and visual presentation of legal rights from the detainee's primary language."

The autonomous car, fortunately, is just not judge, jury and executioner, then it won't have the capacity to taze suspects once they don't have the bail money in addition to their card is declined. (Not less than not really).

"The processing and posting of bail can also be performed by the automobile communication system using a marketing assistant and payment processing device, thereby minimizing delays essential room judicial proceedings," the patent application says. "Including, banking information and pin codes may perhaps be entered to your payment processing device in the vehicle and/or verbally directed at the va."

We are aware what you're thinking: This is the long term America I imagined, a bed that uses machines to extract payments for minor infractions, leveraging the money bail system to nickel and dime citizens for minor crimes.

"For example, anybody may enable payment of your entire bail be the judge, or deliver the court a security alarm affinity for property, or contract having a bail bondsman to post the bail," the patent promises. "Including, in reaction into a verbal input with the detainee for the virtual assistant (such as, “contact bond company”), the communication system contacts a bail bond company, the text company may post the bond and transmit a confirmation of bond payment here we are at the communication system. The processing and posting of bail are often performed by your vehicle communication system using a marketing assistant and payment processing device, thereby minimizing delays problem room judicial proceedings."

We employ a few qualms with this, perhaps you might imagine, and none have to do with videophones or autonomous cars.

Rather, the majority of concern the creeping introduction of automated for-profit policing that at the moment is (thankfully) largely limited to automated traffic cameras with license plate recognition systems, a percentage of your tickets in which are received from the makers of traffic cameras. This patent takes it one step further, effectively promising a "solution" for police departments that streamlines and expedites the kind of work now done by humans. Police officer, the attorney, along with the judge are still there to "help" the procedure along, but it's difficult to check out this page as not a much more advanced sort of a reverse ATM that drives itself around, accepting payments for minor crimes.

The key out from the car is usually to swipe your card or "give the court a burglar affinity for real estate," because the patent highlights, betraying the for-profit policing aspect of the whole contraption. Cash payments on the "reason for sale" have already been a practice in most jurisdictions in terms of traffic tickets, being more attractive to local departments also to city governments than solving burglaries, for example. Just like traffic cameras is often scaled about grow revenue, so can other automated payment processing systems that depend upon our criminal justice system's passion for money, as an alternative to concern public safety. Blasted at 40 mph through a 35 mph zone, or jaywalked by using an empty street at 1am? Here comes the automobile to process you. Don't plenty of on the card for bail? Go right to jail, for the reason that Monopoly game says.

"The processes and proceedings involved with police force communications are oftentimes complex and frustrating," the patent notes. "The computer can be frequently plagued by minor incidents or infractions taking up police force resources, holding facility space, and court time."

The future of police force is pay-and-go — an issue that small municipalities inside U.S. figured out decades ago — perform properly policing to have itself running for a kind of perpetual Rube Goldberg device that includes little to public safety, nickel-and-diming non-wealthy residents out of business.

As much as we'd choose to believe that the software will allow law enforcement officials to redirect resources to solving crimes that are unsolved in overworked departments, traffic infraction cameras have sadly demonstrated that they are an addiction for some people cities, and we all shouldn't be very impressed that this autonomous "reverse ATM" for minor infractions and misdemeanors has already been being cooked up by tech giants.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *